THE SMART TRICK OF REMINGTON 870 FOR SALE THAT NOBODY IS DISCUSSING

The smart Trick of remington 870 for sale That Nobody is Discussing

The smart Trick of remington 870 for sale That Nobody is Discussing

Blog Article

My aim is to seek out the amount of I like shotguns after which up grade in a several years-definitely obtaining guns/shotguns is addictive.

KC but upside down it states CK. not even stamped all of that very well. In terms of the rest of the serial on the opposite , its S656868V. Way more excellent during the wingmaster. Any help on the date of the new one? I think I acquired 2008. Also 2017 based of its ck or kc. any support appreciated. Thanks.

The guns you posted ended up much from "in manufacturing" things, and have been currently collectible and sought after Perfectly ahead of the Remington personal bankruptcy.

(Then, I'd head out and buy a good used middle 80's Citori Standard Hunter with Invectors for approximately seven or eight hundred pounds, following I might recovered my dropped fortunes. :wink: )

casonet stated: With all the ancillary firms now absent and with Roundhill focusing on just the Remington gun company, I would not be amazed to check out an excellent larger top quality item in the future.

I have viewed a lot more of These barrels for sale from the used barrel alternatives at gun outlets than I have anyplace else thru the several years. I have also witnessed 1 for sale on This great site. Plenty of folks seem to be to find barrels on ebay.

We took it at encounter value. I haven't shot metal as a result of the first barrel nevertheless. It had been Remington's advise back during the 80s. I'll inform you the original lead barrel is a great deal thinner in comparison to the steel shot Remchoke barrel.

The 1100 arrived shut. They changed the steel V ring by using a Viton O ring, and so they improved the look with the fore conclusion guidance no less than two times.

I found the Remington Society and located drawings of varied models there. The AP quality from 1959 is precisely the gun I saw. It seems the AD was offered from 1959 to 1963 and that coincides with just what the owner of the gun in problem stated; that he got it from the 60s.

I am looking at a used Remington Wingmaster 870. It has been effectively cared for with several marks/scratches. The dealer is inquiring $three hundred. Is that this a very good price for a late 1980s Wingmaster? I've by no means noticed Yet another used 870 at the store just before to check.

They haven't got a recorded date for that but consider it had been while in the nineteen seventies. I have a imprecise memory of an report dealing with receiver cracks the place the answer was to drill a small hole at the conclusion of the crack. Still trying to find that report.

The wood on this just one is first rate. It seems to happen to be designed with Remington's old "pressed" checkering equipment.

Around the late 60's Remington begun sprucing the steel to a higher luster, as well as started plating the bolt and lifter to prevent have on. Many early Wingmasters have bolts that happen to be boring hunting, and don't seem to resist corrosion. On the other hand, early Wingmasters experienced a lot of the most effective on the lookout Wooden of any Remington, especially the skeet, lure and BDL models. The initial 16 gauge Wingmasters were certainly the ideal balanced, especially as compared to the last "Traditional Field" atrocities. The preset choke barrels have normally had great patterns, and I'll consider a website fixed choke Wingmaster barrel around a screw-choked barrel any working day. I at the moment have 3 Wingmasters, a 1954 ADL 16 gauge with I/C vent ribbed barrel, an early eighty's LT20 with 3 mounted choke barrels, along with a late 80's 410 Wingmaster with a few diverse barrels. I also have an 870 Competitors Entice with a hard and fast entire choke, a total concentrate on crusher.

The only matter I observe, with my Wingmaster it really is much easier to rack the fore-conclusion to eject the put in shell and load a new a person. In all probability as it is nicely damaged in, so to talk. In my opinion, the standard on Equally of mine is excellent.

Report this page